2 November 2014
The title of course is a quote from the Beatles’ song. Not very well chosen, because my article has nothing to do with rain, but is about files and Unix. Sorry, nothing better came to mind.
Where the hole comes into the story isn’t easy to say in a few words. You’ll find out if you ever manage to finish reading and don’t judge my article as “TL;DR” (IHUA!).
The directory name,
truncexp, is short for
Truncate Experiment. That doesn’t quite describe
it either. OK, enough unclarity for now, let’s
For reasons irrelevant to the article, I recently recommissioned my web and mail server VPS (Virtual Private Server) from scratch, installing a fresh FreeBSD 10.0 after having used earlier versions of that same operating system until then.
Contrary to my usual modus operandi (sorry, in Dutch only) I didn’t do the new installation on a new server keeping the old one live until being done. Instead I did the fresh install on the live server, cold turkey. So there was some downtime, no web site, no e-mail. I didn’t mind this time.
Of course I had backups. But they proved to be incomplete. So I ended up having to reconstruct my crontabs (as root and as myself) from memory. Stupid me. I did manage though.
I don’t want Apache’s log file to keep
growing and growing. So once every night I have superuser
root reduce it to say 5000 lines.
I couldn’t quite remember how I used to do that
in the earlier incarnations of my server, and I thought
15 3 * * * cd /usr/local/www/apache24/logs; tail -n 5000 access_log > a; mv a access_log
But that doesn’t work. It results in the log file getting frozen in its quarter past three state, and no new log files lines are ever noticeably written to it (although they are!). Why’s that?
To understand why moving causes an apparent file freeze, we
have to look at what a Unix
mv (move) actually
does. Or what I suppose it does, I never actually opened
any source code.
To me it seems reasonably likely that
mv x y
first tries to
y, just in case it existed. Then x is
linked under the new name y also, so now the
file known so far as
x, is accessible under
The last step is to
unlink the name
x, so its contents and attributes and everything
else that may somehow belong to it, lives on under its new
y, and the
mv (move, or rename)
has effectively taken place.
If you do that to an Apache log file, as I did, the command
mv a access_log, where
a is a
partial copy of the original log file, created by
tail, the new file
won’t have the
inode number and birth date
(on an OS and file system that supports the latter) of the
original log file. Instead, it gets those of the partial copy.
What’s more, what is usually felt as a delete action,
rm (remove), is actually just an
unlike. That is, the name – in fact a
name, one of the names – of the file is removed
from the directory it resides in.
Only if a file ends up with zero names, and no
process still has the file open, is it actually deleted or removed.
Or as the manual page to
unlink(2) (which can be
invoked by the command
man 2 unlink) so nicely
“all resources associated with
the file are reclaimed.”
In the situation under consideration, this means that
mv a access_log doesn’t really delete the
existing, larger log file that I wanted to reduce to just the
most recent lines. Apache 2.4 still has the file open, so the
file remains in existence and can be written to without error,
which is what Apache keeps doing. (I later verified in my
little experiment program (see below), that in this situation
no error code is returned.)
But because the shorter file
a has taken over
access_log, and the original log file
is left with no name at all, there is no way to access that
file, for no directory entry exists to it anywhere.
Apache more or less writes its log lines to a black hole,
never to be seen by anyone, human or machine in nature.
(Note that this is a different kind of
black hole than
Pretty stupid. Not a good solution.
My next idea was a feline approach also known as the cat method, as follows:
15 3 * * * cd /usr/local/www/apache24/logs; tail -n 5000 access_log > a; cat a > access_log; rm a
This way I did not put the shortened file in the place of the
older one, but I wrote its contents over the existing log file.
So the log file remained the same file, had the same
inode number as before and remained accessible
under the same name,
This worked well, and has worked well for years, because after reinventing this method, I realised it was what was there already on previous versions of my VPS.
Yet, after a night’s sleep, I wondered why it worked and if it really did work as intended. I wanted to know more about it. I have been pretty familiar with UNIX file operations already since my first encounter in 1985, but it’s never too late to detail one’s knowledge.
So I wrote some silly little C programs to do some testing to find out what really happens.
Using my test programs, I had
600 lines (I cut the more realistic situation by a factor
ten) of nonsense log file information (log file opened in
"w" mode), just to get some substance to the
file. Then once every 10 seconds or so,
writes an additional line.
Meanwhile, I used
wrimod to copy the most
recent 400 files to a temp file, and then use those contents
as the new logging information, created by various methods.
Now when using the ‘cat method’ (invocation
wrimod -c, or doing the same thing directly,
-w), the result was a file with a hole
That is, it starts with line number 205 or so, through 604
(making the total of 400 lines that Unix command
tail selected), and then it goes on with 607
for example, written by program
later on. But when you look at the byte positions, and the
line numbers calculated from that, you can see something
Writing a line to the logfile, count = 602 (calc'd: 602), position = 49966 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 603 (calc'd: 603), position = 50049 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 604 (calc'd: 604), position = 50132 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 607 (calc'd: 607), position = 50381 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 608 (calc'd: 608), position = 50464 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 609 (calc'd: 609), position = 50547
The numbers mean that
loglines continues to write
where it used to do, despite of the cat (or cat-like write
operation) having made the file smaller!
So the log file consists of lines 205 – 604, then has a
gap that is physically there but isn’t shown when you
read the file (e.g. with
wc), after which follow the lines starting
from number 607.
stat show that the file size
is unaffected although the contents are smaller. This is
undesirable behaviour, creating such a file with a hole
doesn’t make sense, although this is possible and
intended behaviour in Unix file systems. I became aware of
that already sometime during my first Unix period, 1985 –
wrimod with its
-p option, it opens the file in read-write mode.
This results in the hole being filled up with the old contents.
Lines 205 – 604, then 405 to six hundred something.
cat was not the way and I came up with this
instead, in root’s crontab:
15 3,15 * * * cd /usr/local/www/apache24/logs; apachectl stop; tail -n 5000 access_log > a; mv a access_log; apachectl start
So I properly stopped web server Apache, did my log file manipulations, and then restarted Apache. Much more comme il faut and reliable. So far so good.
After another night’s sleep however, I realised that
it cannot possibly be true that Apache opens the log file
in write mode (with
because that would truncate the file every time Apache
(A truncate reduces file length to
zero bytes, but does not assign a new
number and it keeps the birth date the same.)
Instead, Apache logically could only open the log file with
"a", i.e., in append mode. And, quoting the
fopen(3) man page and as verified by my testing,
“[s]ubsequent writes to the
file will always end up at the then current end of file,
irrespective of any intervening fseek(3) or
That means that in practice, the problem with the hole in the file, as described in the previous chapter, does not occur now. That explains why on former web server VPSes, I never noticed a physically ever growing log file that content-wise remained at a reasonable number of lines. Its physical size, in bytes or blocks, was also always reasonable.
Sample test output from
loglines having opened
the file in append mode, again in combination with
Writing a line to the logfile, count = 607 (calc'd: 607), position = 50381 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 608 (calc'd: 608), position = 50464 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 609 (calc'd: 609), position = 50547 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 612 (calc'd: 612), position = 50796 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 613 (calc'd: 401), position = 33283 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 614 (calc'd: 402), position = 33366 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 615 (calc'd: 403), position = 33449 Writing a line to the logfile, count = 616 (calc'd: 404), position = 33532
Note the abrupt change in the byte position (append mode adapting to the current end-of-file position) and as a result, in the calculated line number as opposed to the counted line number.
When testing, I usually start
"./" is because the current directory is usually not in the PATH and I keep the executable in the same directory as the source, doing the complication simply as
cc loglines.c -o loglines. (Although of course
employing a makefile is much better.)
& is used to put the program
in the background.
(To end it prematurely I often use the
loglines run for some time, I start
./wrilog -w (for example, other mode options
Before and after doing its thing, and once again afterwards,
wrimod lists the files. I could have used
ls -li for that, which lists size and inode
of the files, but instead I used
can also show the access, modification, change and birth
I don’t know if other Unixes than FreeBSD, such as
various Linux flavours, also have
if so, if the details are the same. You may wish to create
your own modified testing code if they have not.
The file attribute ‘birth date’ I’m sure is specific to FreeBSD, or rather, to the type of file system that this OS comes with by default. For me, this feature is the prime reason to prefer FreeBSD over Linux: with it, I can sort sitemap.xml by modified date, so its order reflects even minor changes like typo corrections or short later additions to articles, while my RSS feeds are sorted by birth date, so only articles that were really freshly written are on top.
A quote from the FreeBSD 10.0 man page to
True if the current file is sparse, i.e. has fewer blocks allocated than expected based on its size in bytes. This might also match files that have been compressed by the filesystem.”
So what I called a “file with holes” here, is in fact a “sparse file” in technical Unix terms. Now that I see this word again, I vaguely remember having seen it before, in the late nineteen eighties.
Copyright © 2014 by R. Harmsen, all rights reserved.
Vostre annuncio ci?
Your ad here?
dominio: rudhar puncto com
Linguas de correspondentia:
nl, ia, en, de, pt