Featured articles (en: language is English)


Any sexual behaviour is permitted, that does not violate the principle of mutual consideration between those involved. Involved are the ones that make love to each other, but also any other regular sexual partners of any of them. As an example, this implies that married people are allowed to have sexual relations outside of their marriage, but only if this is possible without hurting the feelings of the marriage partner.

Sexuality


where we read:

E, depois que amanheceu, não houvemos vista dele nem dos outros navios;
[...]
Ao domingo seguinte, em amanhecendo, houvemos vista da Ilha do Sal, e logo daí a uma hora houvemos vista de três navios, os quais fomos demandar; [...]

Eu houve? Doesn't exist!


Youtube is a goldmine for anyone who loves music. In the olden days we had to listen to a few songs a time in a record shop, hoping to find the occasional masterpiece. You can now do this on the computer in your home, limitless. Once you started, you just follow suggestions.

One such smile a day


In addition to coins, we now have banknotes. The paper they are made of is essentially worthless (although the production costs of banknotes are not negligible). Banknotes derive their value from what they symbolically represent: a claim to an issuing central bank.

Representing all value?


A financial claim of the public on a bank (ii) by definition is money.

A financial claim of a bank on anyone (i) by definition is NOT money.

Give up commensurable consideration


I think his thoughts on that subjects are completely wrong. He thinks the same of me.

How is that possible? Our views are diametrically opposed, yet we read, and both think we understood, the exact same document.

Same document, different interpretation


Why did I call my article what I called it, Rouille Veux l’Eauzou? I suppose nobody understands. Now a joke isn’t funny if you have to explain it, but keeping it a mystery for ever can be irritating too.

So I leave the choice to you as a reader. The explanation is below, but under a lot of spoiler separation lines.

Why that title?


An earlier version of my document used the similar, but not identical ASCII transcription scheme often referred to as IPA-ASCII, which was designed by Evan Kirshenbaum.

Below is a correspondence table of the two systems, limited to phonemic symbols used for Portuguese in my document, plus some phonetic symbols occasionally used for clarifications.
I might one day add a column with the real phonetic symbols, but that requires browsers that support Unicode.

Phonemic and phonetic symbols


he wants no money creation by banks, and he thinks banks should have the money they lend out.

And as I see it, that is easy to achieve. Not by changing and reforming and perhaps disrupting the whole system, with chaos, civil war, poverty and hunger as a possible consequence. Nor by changing the definition of money. But simply by using a different definition of money, equally valid but suitable for different purposes.

Different definition, same system


With money, it’s no different, except that now we call the fee or rent ‘interest’. Everything else is the same: the owner of the money doesn’t need it for some time, meanwhile somebody else can use it, without becoming the owner. But that comes at a price: interest.

So borrowing money is in fact renting money. Lending out money is basically the same as renting it out.

Is interest theft?


Esperanto is a language that falls outside of the scope of ISO-8859-1, because of its u with breve and c, g, s, j and h with a circumflex. An old workaround is to write ‘ch’ for ‘ĉ’ etc., but this isn’t 100% unambiguous. For example, when converting a web page written with this convention, you must take care that the ‘ch’ in charset=ISO-8859-1 in the head isn’t also converted, to become ĉarset!

A newer convention is to use ‘cx’ instead of ‘ch’, ‘sx’ for ‘sh’, etc. But that is ugly. The real characters of course look best.

Exotic entities


As stated in the first chapter, the vzajku *) religion knows no personal God. God is reflected in nature, man is part of nature, so God is in man. The relation of man to God is in essence the relation to oneself, to the divine aspects of man. That is why the vzajku religion deals largely with the way man controls his own life, his own behaviour, and religion becomes largely identical with ethics.

The vzajku religion


Now to answer the question, why it is that only banks can create money: that follows from the definition of money. That definition is as it is for good reason. If the definition of money were different, then non-bank persons and companies could create money just like banks.

If banks can, why can't we?


That’s simple, I thought, I just reverse the grep by means of the well-known reversal option -v, the one I also used above to exclude some file names from the search.

But it didn’t work. HTML files that I know had markings, appeared in the original list (correctly), but ALSO in the resulting list after adding -v. How could that happen?

Grep -v? No, -L!


IPA symbols, and ASCII transcription systems compared

Links to linguistic and phonetic glossaries and explanations



Colours: Neutral Weird No preference Reload screen